This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical analysis. It discusses key concepts like knowledge, facts, opinions, arguments, logic, and fallacies. The document encourages applying systematic doubt to statements to analyze them, using examples like claims about one's identity or abilities. Readers are advised to consider whether a statement is factual, an opinion, belief, argument, or explanation in order to distinguish truth from falsehood. Philosophical tools like logic and identifying logical fallacies can guide determining the truthfulness of different types of statements.
The document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and distinguishing truth from opinion. It discusses how philosophers examine knowledge and its basis in reality or facts. Opinions are judgments or perspectives that may be influenced by bias, while arguments try to convince others of a claim using reasoning that could include fallacies. When analyzing statements, philosophy teaches us to apply systematic doubt and consider various biases that could affect perspectives. Understanding the difference between facts and opinions can guide us to wisdom in forming our own views.
This document provides an overview of methods for determining the truth or validity of claims through philosophical inquiry. It discusses how ancient Greek philosophers approached truth by examining the nature of knowledge and how we know what we know. It emphasizes employing systematic doubt to scrutinize all statements and determine truth, rather than taking anything as true without sufficient evidence. The document also differentiates between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions, arguments, beliefs, conclusions, explanations, and fallacies. It stresses that arguments may be based on faulty reasoning and fallacies, misleading the reader, so it is important to consider the characteristics and types of fallacies.
The document discusses various philosophical concepts related to determining truth, including knowledge, facts, claims, arguments, and biases. It provides examples to illustrate these concepts and examines statements to distinguish those that are factual from those that are opinions. The document also discusses logical fallacies and biases that can influence arguments. It emphasizes that understanding the difference between facts and opinions is important for gaining wisdom and forming well-reasoned views. Analyzing different perspectives on issues while being aware of one's own biases can help achieve more objective evaluations.
This document provides an overview of methods for philosophizing and determining truth. It discusses the importance of truth and differentiating between knowledge, facts, claims, opinions and arguments. Systematic doubt is presented as a philosophical method for establishing truth by scrutinizing and analyzing statements. Examples are provided to illustrate applying systematic doubt to determine whether a statement is factual or an opinion. Fallacies in reasoning that can undermine arguments are also defined and exemplified. The document aims to teach philosophical thinking and analysis to discern truth from falsehood.
This document discusses various methods and concepts for distinguishing opinions from facts and truth, including:
1. Activities that analyze statements as either facts or opinions, and determine truth through senses, facts, consensus, or documentation.
2. Key terms like arguments, fallacies, biases that can influence opinions. Logic, fallacies like appeals and biases must be considered when evaluating arguments.
3. Philosophical methods like the Socratic method, scientific method, and historical method can be used to determine truth from opinions in different situations. Understanding the difference between opinions and truth can guide us to wisdom in evaluating varied views and making wise decisions.
This document discusses key concepts in philosophy, including truth, knowledge, propositions, and methods for determining what is true. It provides definitions and examples of facts, claims, opinions, beliefs, explanations, arguments, and logical fallacies. Common biases are also explained. The overall purpose is to guide the reader in distinguishing truth from opinion and analyzing statements using philosophical methods.
1. Philosophers emphasize determining truth through careful examination and justification rather than just belief. They subject their own knowledge and assumptions to doubt in order to learn.
2. For a statement to be considered true, it must be justified or proven through evidence, agreed upon as factual, and able to be applied and tested in the real world.
3. Philosophers distinguish truth from opinion by examining arguments closely for logical fallacies or biases that could undermine the reasoning. A variety of common fallacies and biases that weaken arguments are discussed.
1. The document discusses various philosophical concepts and methods for determining truth, including the relationship between truth and knowledge, the nature of propositions, and how philosophers establish truth through questioning beliefs and using evidence and reason.
2. It also examines how to distinguish facts from opinions, and the role of logic and fallacies in philosophical arguments. Bias and faulty reasoning can undermine arguments and make it difficult to determine what is true.
3. Philosophers emphasize using doubt, evidence, and rigorous reasoning to separate opinions and beliefs from verifiable facts, in order to gain a clearer understanding of truth and knowledge.
This document discusses various philosophical theories of truth and methods for determining truth. It defines truth as a core concept in inquiry and knowledge. The document outlines correspondence theory, which holds that something is true if it corresponds to reality, and coherence theory, which says something is true if it makes sense within a given context. It also discusses relativism, constructivism, and consensus theory. The document provides examples and analyzes factors like biases, facts vs opinions, and logical fallacies that can influence determining truth. Activities are included to help students apply these concepts.
This document discusses the concepts of wisdom and truth. It begins by outlining an activity for students to do in groups. It then provides definitions and explanations of wisdom, truth, and related philosophical concepts. Examples are given of facts versus opinions. The document also discusses how to gain wisdom from God according to the Bible and examines logical fallacies and cognitive biases. At the end, students are given application and assessment questions.
The document provides an overview of different philosophical theories for determining truth and discusses concepts like biases, facts vs opinions, and fallacies that are relevant to assessing the truthfulness of statements or ideas. It explains key theories such as the correspondence theory, which views something as true if it corresponds to reality, and the coherence theory, which sees truth as something making sense within a given context. The document also outlines common biases like confirmation bias and cultural bias that can influence perspectives, as well as logical fallacies to watch out for in arguments. It emphasizes that determining truth requires careful consideration of evidence, perspectives, and potential biases or flaws in reasoning.
Here are examples of statements demonstrating each type of bias:
1. Attribution effect: "He failed the exam so he must be lazy."
2. Confirmation bias: "I don't believe the studies showing vaccines are safe because I'm convinced they cause autism."
3. Framing: "The debate focuses on tax cuts and ignores spending cuts."
4. Hindsight: "In retrospect it was obvious they would get divorced."
5. Conflict of interest: "As an employee of the company, I think their practices are ethical."
6. Cultural bias: "Their parenting style is too permissive based on my cultural upbringing."
This document presents a lesson on methods of philosophizing and determining what is true. It discusses how philosophers use systematic doubt to scrutinize statements and beliefs in order to determine what can be proven as true. Several examples are provided of applying this method to evaluate statements about oneself and one's identity. Students are guided through examining their senses and using facts to justify beliefs. The goal is to understand the nature of knowledge and how philosophy can help arrive at reasonable assessments of what is truthful.
The document outlines three methods of philosophizing: 1) distinguishing opinion from truth by analyzing situations correctly, 2) realizing that philosophical methods lead to wisdom and truth, and 3) evaluating truth and opinion in different situations using the method of philosophizing.
Critical Thinking & TOK require questioning information and separating facts from unsupported claims. Ultimately, there are no absolute truths - knowledge claims must be scrutinized and supported by evidence while considering alternative viewpoints. We should believe things that are logically coherent and correspond with evidence, avoiding both unwarranted certainty and unfounded skepticism.
Module 2.2 Methods of Philosophizing.pptxFERMORAMOS1
油
The document discusses several philosophizing methods:
- The dialectic method uses questioning to reveal contradictions and arrive at truth.
- The pragmatic method tests beliefs through their practical results.
- The phenomenological method puts aside biases through reflection on immediate experience.
- Other methods include analysis of language and primary/secondary reflections.
Looks at some doubtful beliefs that people (focusing on Evangelical Christians in this case) often believe when it comes to conversations with people of other religions. Emphasis is on how to influence effectively and positively.
Post Colonial Lit amp; A Small Place Essay Example Topics and Well .... Admission Essay: My favourite place short essay. My favourite place short essays. My favourite place essay writing. Writing A Descriptive Essay On My .... Buy A Descriptive Essay About My Favourite Place, My Favorite Place. Write an essay on A visit to historical place Essay Writing English .... My favorite place essay topic - writerstable.web.fc2.com. My favorite place home essay. My Beautiful Place Essay Example 400 Words - PHDessay.com. My favourite place short essay about nature. Free Narrative Essay Examples - Samples amp; Format - Example of a good .... Essay writing on my favorite place. Short essays or paragraphs for grade 6-11 students. Short essay .... 5 Paragraph Essay On Your Favorite Place. A small place essay - Adnan 1 Mirab Adnan Ms. Giron ENG2D8 Tuesday .... 017 Short Descriptive Essay About Place Example Discriptive Cover .... Essay about a favorite place. An Unforgettable Travel Essay - An unforgettable trip Essay Examples. 014 Best Ideas Of Favorite Place Essay Descriptive About My Excellent .... Descriptive Essay: My house is the best place essay. Descriptive essay about a place 4 models Topics in English. Essay about my favorite place descriptive - pdfeports867.web.fc2.com. How To Start And How To Write An Autobiography Essay Examples 2022. 019 Essay About Place Example Thatsnotus. Narrative essay: My place essay. A special place. - GCSE English - Marked by Teachers.com. describing a place essay
This document discusses various methods and concepts for distinguishing opinions from facts and truth, including:
1. Activities that analyze statements as either facts or opinions, and determine truth through senses, facts, consensus, or documentation.
2. Key terms like arguments, fallacies, biases that can influence opinions. Logic, fallacies like appeals and biases must be considered when evaluating arguments.
3. Philosophical methods like the Socratic method, scientific method, and historical method can be used to determine truth from opinions in different situations. Understanding the difference between opinions and truth can guide us to wisdom in evaluating varied views and making wise decisions.
This document discusses key concepts in philosophy, including truth, knowledge, propositions, and methods for determining what is true. It provides definitions and examples of facts, claims, opinions, beliefs, explanations, arguments, and logical fallacies. Common biases are also explained. The overall purpose is to guide the reader in distinguishing truth from opinion and analyzing statements using philosophical methods.
1. Philosophers emphasize determining truth through careful examination and justification rather than just belief. They subject their own knowledge and assumptions to doubt in order to learn.
2. For a statement to be considered true, it must be justified or proven through evidence, agreed upon as factual, and able to be applied and tested in the real world.
3. Philosophers distinguish truth from opinion by examining arguments closely for logical fallacies or biases that could undermine the reasoning. A variety of common fallacies and biases that weaken arguments are discussed.
1. The document discusses various philosophical concepts and methods for determining truth, including the relationship between truth and knowledge, the nature of propositions, and how philosophers establish truth through questioning beliefs and using evidence and reason.
2. It also examines how to distinguish facts from opinions, and the role of logic and fallacies in philosophical arguments. Bias and faulty reasoning can undermine arguments and make it difficult to determine what is true.
3. Philosophers emphasize using doubt, evidence, and rigorous reasoning to separate opinions and beliefs from verifiable facts, in order to gain a clearer understanding of truth and knowledge.
This document discusses various philosophical theories of truth and methods for determining truth. It defines truth as a core concept in inquiry and knowledge. The document outlines correspondence theory, which holds that something is true if it corresponds to reality, and coherence theory, which says something is true if it makes sense within a given context. It also discusses relativism, constructivism, and consensus theory. The document provides examples and analyzes factors like biases, facts vs opinions, and logical fallacies that can influence determining truth. Activities are included to help students apply these concepts.
This document discusses the concepts of wisdom and truth. It begins by outlining an activity for students to do in groups. It then provides definitions and explanations of wisdom, truth, and related philosophical concepts. Examples are given of facts versus opinions. The document also discusses how to gain wisdom from God according to the Bible and examines logical fallacies and cognitive biases. At the end, students are given application and assessment questions.
The document provides an overview of different philosophical theories for determining truth and discusses concepts like biases, facts vs opinions, and fallacies that are relevant to assessing the truthfulness of statements or ideas. It explains key theories such as the correspondence theory, which views something as true if it corresponds to reality, and the coherence theory, which sees truth as something making sense within a given context. The document also outlines common biases like confirmation bias and cultural bias that can influence perspectives, as well as logical fallacies to watch out for in arguments. It emphasizes that determining truth requires careful consideration of evidence, perspectives, and potential biases or flaws in reasoning.
Here are examples of statements demonstrating each type of bias:
1. Attribution effect: "He failed the exam so he must be lazy."
2. Confirmation bias: "I don't believe the studies showing vaccines are safe because I'm convinced they cause autism."
3. Framing: "The debate focuses on tax cuts and ignores spending cuts."
4. Hindsight: "In retrospect it was obvious they would get divorced."
5. Conflict of interest: "As an employee of the company, I think their practices are ethical."
6. Cultural bias: "Their parenting style is too permissive based on my cultural upbringing."
This document presents a lesson on methods of philosophizing and determining what is true. It discusses how philosophers use systematic doubt to scrutinize statements and beliefs in order to determine what can be proven as true. Several examples are provided of applying this method to evaluate statements about oneself and one's identity. Students are guided through examining their senses and using facts to justify beliefs. The goal is to understand the nature of knowledge and how philosophy can help arrive at reasonable assessments of what is truthful.
The document outlines three methods of philosophizing: 1) distinguishing opinion from truth by analyzing situations correctly, 2) realizing that philosophical methods lead to wisdom and truth, and 3) evaluating truth and opinion in different situations using the method of philosophizing.
Critical Thinking & TOK require questioning information and separating facts from unsupported claims. Ultimately, there are no absolute truths - knowledge claims must be scrutinized and supported by evidence while considering alternative viewpoints. We should believe things that are logically coherent and correspond with evidence, avoiding both unwarranted certainty and unfounded skepticism.
Module 2.2 Methods of Philosophizing.pptxFERMORAMOS1
油
The document discusses several philosophizing methods:
- The dialectic method uses questioning to reveal contradictions and arrive at truth.
- The pragmatic method tests beliefs through their practical results.
- The phenomenological method puts aside biases through reflection on immediate experience.
- Other methods include analysis of language and primary/secondary reflections.
Looks at some doubtful beliefs that people (focusing on Evangelical Christians in this case) often believe when it comes to conversations with people of other religions. Emphasis is on how to influence effectively and positively.
Post Colonial Lit amp; A Small Place Essay Example Topics and Well .... Admission Essay: My favourite place short essay. My favourite place short essays. My favourite place essay writing. Writing A Descriptive Essay On My .... Buy A Descriptive Essay About My Favourite Place, My Favorite Place. Write an essay on A visit to historical place Essay Writing English .... My favorite place essay topic - writerstable.web.fc2.com. My favorite place home essay. My Beautiful Place Essay Example 400 Words - PHDessay.com. My favourite place short essay about nature. Free Narrative Essay Examples - Samples amp; Format - Example of a good .... Essay writing on my favorite place. Short essays or paragraphs for grade 6-11 students. Short essay .... 5 Paragraph Essay On Your Favorite Place. A small place essay - Adnan 1 Mirab Adnan Ms. Giron ENG2D8 Tuesday .... 017 Short Descriptive Essay About Place Example Discriptive Cover .... Essay about a favorite place. An Unforgettable Travel Essay - An unforgettable trip Essay Examples. 014 Best Ideas Of Favorite Place Essay Descriptive About My Excellent .... Descriptive Essay: My house is the best place essay. Descriptive essay about a place 4 models Topics in English. Essay about my favorite place descriptive - pdfeports867.web.fc2.com. How To Start And How To Write An Autobiography Essay Examples 2022. 019 Essay About Place Example Thatsnotus. Narrative essay: My place essay. A special place. - GCSE English - Marked by Teachers.com. describing a place essay
Useful environment methods in Odoo 18 - Odoo 際際滷sCeline George
油
In this slide well discuss on the useful environment methods in Odoo 18. In Odoo 18, environment methods play a crucial role in simplifying model interactions and enhancing data processing within the ORM framework.
How to attach file using upload button Odoo 18Celine George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to attach file using upload button Odoo 18. Odoo features a dedicated model, 'ir.attachments,' designed for storing attachments submitted by end users. We can see the process of utilizing the 'ir.attachments' model to enable file uploads through web forms in this slide.
Digital Tools with AI for e-Content Development.pptxDr. Sarita Anand
油
This ppt is useful for not only for B.Ed., M.Ed., M.A. (Education) or any other PG level students or Ph.D. scholars but also for the school, college and university teachers who are interested to prepare an e-content with AI for their students and others.
Finals of Rass MELAI : a Music, Entertainment, Literature, Arts and Internet Culture Quiz organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Finals of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
Prelims of Kaun TALHA : a Travel, Architecture, Lifestyle, Heritage and Activism quiz, organized by Conquiztadors, the Quiz society of Sri Venkateswara College under their annual quizzing fest El Dorado 2025.
APM People Interest Network Conference 2025
-Autonomy, Teams and Tension: Projects under stress
-Tim Lyons
-The neurological levels of
team-working: Harmony and tensions
With a background in projects spanning more than 40 years, Tim Lyons specialised in the delivery of large, complex, multi-disciplinary programmes for clients including Crossrail, Network Rail, ExxonMobil, Siemens and in patent development. His first career was in broadcasting, where he designed and built commercial radio station studios in Manchester, Cardiff and Bristol, also working as a presenter and programme producer. Tim now writes and presents extensively on matters relating to the human and neurological aspects of projects, including communication, ethics and coaching. He holds a Masters degree in NLP, is an NLP Master Practitioner and International Coach. He is the Deputy Lead for APMs People Interest Network.
Session | The Neurological Levels of Team-working: Harmony and Tensions
Understanding how teams really work at conscious and unconscious levels is critical to a harmonious workplace. This session uncovers what those levels are, how to use them to detect and avoid tensions and how to smooth the management of change by checking you have considered all of them.
Chapter 3. Social Responsibility and Ethics in Strategic Management.pptxRommel Regala
油
This course provides students with a comprehensive understanding of strategic management principles, frameworks, and applications in business. It explores strategic planning, environmental analysis, corporate governance, business ethics, and sustainability. The course integrates Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to enhance global and ethical perspectives in decision-making.
APM People Interest Network Conference 2025
- Autonomy, Teams and Tension
- Oliver Randall & David Bovis
- Own Your Autonomy
Oliver Randall
Consultant, Tribe365
Oliver is a career project professional since 2011 and started volunteering with APM in 2016 and has since chaired the People Interest Network and the North East Regional Network. Oliver has been consulting in culture, leadership and behaviours since 2019 and co-developed HPTM速an off the shelf high performance framework for teams and organisations and is currently working with SAS (Stellenbosch Academy for Sport) developing the culture, leadership and behaviours framework for future elite sportspeople whilst also holding down work as a project manager in the NHS at North Tees and Hartlepool Foundation Trust.
David Bovis
Consultant, Duxinaroe
A Leadership and Culture Change expert, David is the originator of BTFA and The Dux Model.
With a Masters in Applied Neuroscience from the Institute of Organisational Neuroscience, he is widely regarded as the Go-To expert in the field, recognised as an inspiring keynote speaker and change strategist.
He has an industrial engineering background, majoring in TPS / Lean. David worked his way up from his apprenticeship to earn his seat at the C-suite table. His career spans several industries, including Automotive, Aerospace, Defence, Space, Heavy Industries and Elec-Mech / polymer contract manufacture.
Published in Londons Evening Standard quarterly business supplement, James Caans Your business Magazine, Quality World, the Lean Management Journal and Cambridge Universities PMA, he works as comfortably with leaders from FTSE and Fortune 100 companies as he does owner-managers in SMEs. He is passionate about helping leaders understand the neurological root cause of a high-performance culture and sustainable change, in business.
Session | Own Your Autonomy The Importance of Autonomy in Project Management
#OwnYourAutonomy is aiming to be a global APM initiative to position everyone to take a more conscious role in their decision making process leading to increased outcomes for everyone and contribute to a world in which all projects succeed.
We want everyone to join the journey.
#OwnYourAutonomy is the culmination of 3 years of collaborative exploration within the Leadership Focus Group which is part of the APM People Interest Network. The work has been pulled together using the 5 HPTM速 Systems and the BTFA neuroscience leadership programme.
https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/apm-people-network/about/
SOCIAL CHANGE(a change in the institutional and normative structure of societ...DrNidhiAgarwal
油
This PPT is showing the effect of social changes in human life and it is very understandable to the students with easy language.in this contents are Itroduction, definition,Factors affecting social changes ,Main technological factors, Social change and stress , what is eustress and how social changes give impact of the human's life.
How to Modify Existing Web Pages in Odoo 18Celine George
油
In this slide, well discuss on how to modify existing web pages in Odoo 18. Web pages in Odoo 18 can also gather user data through user-friendly forms, encourage interaction through engaging features.
3. In todays society, we encounter a lot of information
Media and our interactions with our friends,
family, and members of the community.
Most of the information we receive is helpful,
but some may mislead us or may even be utterly
false.
Every day we are confronted with news, claims
and announcements from our peers, family
members, figures of authority, the
government, and media.
How do we know if they telling the truth?
3
4. In todays society, we encounter a lot of information
Philosophers often wrestle with the concept of
truth.
Knowledge must be truthful to gain validity
and acceptance.
For example, when we answer a True or False
test, we judge if the statements we read are
true or false. This means that statements may
have truth or may not have truth.
Statements about the world or reality are
called propositions and these propositions
may or may not carry truth. Propositions are
usually stated as short statements or sentences.
4
6. 1.
KNOWLEDGE
The clear awareness and understanding of
something. It is the product of questions that
allow for clear answers provided by facts.
Our knowledge is comprised of ideas and
beliefs that we know to be true.
7.
I know that...
I know why...
I know how...
One important aspect of knowledge- it is based on
reality. This simply means that what we know is what
is observable or evident in the real world.
7
9.
Example: I know that fish live in water.
How do we know?
Because fish really do live in water.
9
10. 3.
CLAIM
Statements that are not evidently or
immediately known to be true
They require further examination to
establish whether it is true or false.
11.
Example:
I know that my school is the best school in the
city.
You may know that reading is a better activity than
playing basketball but the truth of your statement
will be contested by other people.
11
12. How do we know if something is TRUE?
Ancient Greek Philosophers approached the
problem of truth by looking at the nature
of knowledge and how we know what we
know.
We assume that everything we know about
this world is true. But philosophers who
pondered upon the origins of knowledge
doubted everything there is to know
about themselves and the world.
12
14. As it drives our desire to discover truth. In
philosophy, systematic doubt is employed to
determine truth. This means that every
statement, claim, evidence, and is scrutinized
and analysed.
Nothing is taken as true unless there is
sufficient reason and evidence to prove that
is indeed true.
Doubt has very important purpose in philosophy
14
28. EVIDENCE
especially documents can be forged or
falsified.
A person may be
issued with
documents
but it may contain wrong information
or typographical error.
28
29. if your name is
mispelled in your
birthcertificate
DOES YOUR IDENTITY CHANGE?
29
30. Example:
I can ride a bike/ Can I ride a
bike?
I can fry an egg/ Can I fry an egg?
30
31. The obvious answer would be, is to
actually ride it cook it.--- BUT, some would
argue that the proof is not only in the act but
also in the product.
This means that you should not only show
that you can fry an egg but that also you can
make delicious fried eggs.
How will you prove that you can really cook an egg?
31
32. 5.
A BELIEF is true if...
a person can prove a
statement through an
action.
32
34. Which of the following
statements are similar?
Let's rearrange them.
35. It takes me 30 minutes to walk
from my home to school.
Living near the school is
better because we dont
have to spend much for
transportation.
My sister ate the last piece of
pizza.
My sister is a selfish person
because she ate the last piece
and didnt share it with me.
The police firmly pushed the
suspect to his kneed and
placed him in handcuffs.
The aggressive manner by
which the police arrested the
suspect is an example of
brutality that characterizes
our police force.
Which column has statements that are more factual?
35
36. It takes me 30 minutes to walk
from my home to school.
Living near the school is
better because we dont
have to spend much for
transportation.
My sister ate the last piece of
pizza.
My sister is a selfish person
because she ate the last piece
and didnt share it with me.
The police firmly pushed the
suspect to his kneed and
placed him in handcuffs.
The aggressive manner by
which the police arrested the
suspect is an example of
brutality that characterizes
our police force.
Which column has statements that are more factual?
36
FACTUAL OPINION
38. OPINION
Comprised of statements which not
only give facts but also provide
conclusions or perspectives regarding
certain situations.
They may advance a belief about
certain things or provide
explanations.
The bases for making arguments
and convincing people that a
certain claim is a fact. They are
often influenced by bias.
40. beliefs
Statements that express convictions that are not
easily and clearly explained by facts.
To judge the truthfulness of a belief, we must also
consider things such as the persons experiences
and views.
41. beliefs
Example: I believe that God put me on this Earth
to spread his message of love.
42. Explanation
Statements that assume the claim to be true and
provide reasons why the statement is true.
Example: Statement 4: My sister is selfish
because...
43. Argument
s
Series of statements that provide reasons to
convince the reader or listener that a claim or
opinion is truthful.
They often take the form of statements that are
either claims of facts and are phrased in such a way
that they seem reasonable.
47. Argument
s
Series of statements that provide reasons to
convince the reader or listener that a claim or
opinion is truthful.
However, a number of arguments may be based on
faulty reasoning.
48. FALLACY
(Kamalian)
An idea that a lot of people think is true but is in
fact false
A misleading argument
49. FALLACY CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Ad hominem Attacking the person
instead of the
argument itself
Of course he believes that the
government is flawed, he is a
rebel and a Communist
Ad baculum
(appeal to force)
Using the threat of force
or an undesirable event
to advance an argument
If you do not agree with my
political opinions, you will
receive flat 70 on your
card.
Ad misericordiam
(appeal to pity)
Using emotions such as
pity and sympathy
You cant fire me, I have a wife
and 12 kids who will go
hungry if I lose this job.
Ad populum
(appeal to majority
or bandwagon)
The idea is presented as
acceptable because a
lot of people accept it
Every boy your age already has
a girlfriend, you should go find
one!
Ad antiquitatem
(appeal to
tradition)
The idea is acceptable
because it has been
true for a long time
Marriage has traditionally been
between a man and a woman;
therefore, gay marriage should
not be allowed.
Ad verecundiam misusing an
authority
4 out of 5 dentists agree that brushing your
teeth makes your life meaningful.
Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist
and perhaps the foremost expert in the field,
says that evolution is true. Therefore, it's
true.
(appeal to
authority)
50. FALLACY CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Fallacy of
Composition
Assuming that what is true
of a part is true for the
whole
Each brick in that building weighs less than
a pound. Therefore, the building weighs
less than a pound.
Hydrogen is not wet. Oxygen is not wet.
Therefore, water (H2O) is not wet.
Fallacy of Division Assuming that what is true
for the whole is true for its
parts
You come from a family of doctors and lawyers! Surely,
you can do better in this course!
I heard that the Catholic Church was involved in a sex
scandal cover-up. Therefore, my 102-year-old Catholic
neighbor, who frequently attends Church, is guilty as
well!
Hasty
Generalization
The generalization is
reached too hastily. There
are too few instances or
evidences to support such a
conclusion.
You can't speak French. I cant
speak French. Carla can't speak
French; therefore, nobody in this
school can speak French.
Post Hoc
(false cause)
Assuming a cause-and-
effect relationship
between unrelated events
Every time you wear your red
scarf, you cry. You should get rid
of it.
51. BIAS
(PAGKILING)
The personal views of the person presenting it.
They are not necessarily errors in reasoning, but
refer to tendencies or influences which affect
the views of people.
52. BIAS CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Correspondence
bias
(Fundamental
attribution
error)
Tendency to judge a
persons personality by
his/her actions without
regard for external
factors or situations
The soldiers who fought
in the war are all
bloodthirsty murderers.
Confirmation bias the tendency to look for
and accept information in
a way that confirms one's
own beliefs and reject
ideas that go against it
How can I accept his view
that there is no God? I am a
Christian!
53. BIAS CHARACTERISTICS EXAMPLE
Conflict of interest A person or group is
connected to or has a
vested interest in the
issue
As the daughter of the
accused, I believe that I have
the right to express my
opinion on the issue of his
alleged corrupt practices.
Cultural bias Analyzing an event or
issue based on ones
cultural standards
I do not agree with this
Western practice of placing
the elderly in retirement
homes.
We Filipinos take care of
our family members.
Framing Focusing on a certain
aspect of a problem
while ignoring other
aspects
Preliminary evidence has
still not pointed out the
actual cause of the plane
crash, but investigators are
currently focusing on the
possibility of pilot error.
Hindsight
(knew-it-all-along
phenomenon)
Is when, after an event
occurs, we feel we
already knew what was
going to happen
When you put a glass on the
edge of a table and you start
cleaning and bumped the glass
and it fell to the ground and
54. HOW CAN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE
DIFFERNCE BETWEEN TRUTH AND
OPINION LEAD US TO WISDOM?
54
Understanding of opinions and facts and the
means to distinguish one from the other
can further improve our understanding and
appreciation of varied views and ideas. The
ability to determine truth goes hand in
hand with the holistic perspective and
enables us to make wiser decisions,
especially in choosing the ideas and views
which we find acceptable.
55. HOW CAN AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE
DIFFERNCE BETWEEN TRUTH AND
OPINION LEAD US TO WISDOM?
55
An individual cannot live his or her life just
agreeing with everybody he or she meets. A
critical mind aided by philosophy can help us form
our own personal point of view that can guide us
in making decisions and actions when faced with a
problem.
Philosophy can help us determine ideas that are
truthful and acceptable which we can then use
to form our own views regarding certain
matters.
56. Let us imagine several individuals reacting to a
news in television and radio about teh recent
killings of drug pushers and addicts throughout the
country
MANG
ANTONIO
ATTY.
MACARAIG
MRS. LOPEZ
FATHER GOMEZ MR. TOLENTINO MRS. ALONZO
56
57. NOW, LET'S LOOK AT THEIR BACKGROUND
MANG
ANTONIO
A citizen who lives in a
barangay where the
presence of drugs
addicts is a problem
ATTY.
MACARAIG
A lawyer and a citizen
MRS. LOPEZ
A housewife whose
family lives in a
community
FATHER GOMEZ
A priest
MR. TOLENTINO
A father whose
daughter was raped
and murdered by drug
addicts.
MRS. ALONZO
A mother whose
son is a drug addict.
57
58. Figuring out the backgrounds of the people
who made the statements allows us to
undertand the context by which they formed
their views and opinions on the issue.
61. Which among the opinions is most similar to your
own personal bias regarding the issue of the drug
addicts?
62. PHILOSOPHY CAN HELP US EXAMINE VARIOUS VIEWS ON
RELEVANT ISSUES AND OUR LIVES. AN OBJECTIVE
EVALUATION OF OPINIONS AND AN AWARENESS OF OUR
OWN PERSONAL BIASES CAN HELP US MAKE WISE
CHOICES RAGRDING THE MOST ACCEPTABLE VIEWS TO
ADOPT AND THE RIGHT ACTIONS TO UNDERTAKE.
62