Comparison of a fall risk assessment tool with nurses judgment aloneDanskSygeplejeraad
油
1) Several studies have found that commonly used fall risk assessment tools like STRATIFY have limited diagnostic accuracy in predicting falls and do not perform better than nurses' clinical judgement alone.
2) A large randomized controlled trial found that regularly using a fall risk assessment tool in nursing homes did not reduce falls or fall-related injuries compared to usual care without a tool.
3) There is little evidence that widespread use of existing fall risk assessment tools generates meaningful clinical benefits, and they may waste scarce nursing resources that could be better spent on direct patient care.
Comparison of a fall risk assessment tool with nurses judgment aloneDanskSygeplejeraad
油
1) Several studies have found that commonly used fall risk assessment tools like STRATIFY have limited diagnostic accuracy in predicting falls and do not perform better than nurses' clinical judgement alone.
2) A large randomized controlled trial found that regularly using a fall risk assessment tool in nursing homes did not reduce falls or fall-related injuries compared to usual care without a tool.
3) There is little evidence that widespread use of existing fall risk assessment tools generates meaningful clinical benefits, and they may waste scarce nursing resources that could be better spent on direct patient care.
Hvad fik patienter med atrieflimren ud af et struktureret sygeplejeforl淡b?DanskSygeplejeraad
油
Systematiske reviews - udvikling af evidensbaseret sygepleje
1. Systematiske reviews - udvikling af evidensbaseret sygepleje
Linda Vad Bennetzen
Helle Svenningsen, Klinisk sygeplejespecialist, MKS, ph.d., An脱stesiologisk afdeling, Aarhus
Anita Haahr, Adjunkt, cand. cur., ph.d., VIA Sygeplejerskeuddannelsen i rhus
Peter Errboe Jensen, Lektor, cand. scient., ph.d., VIA Sygeplejerskeuddannelsen i rhus
2. En atypisk Bacheloropgave
Kombineret modul 13+14 forl淡b
Kursus: Comprehensive systematic review training (Center for Kliniske Retningslinjer)
Udformning af opgaven:
Systematisk review om nasalsonder (i peer- review)
Supplement
3. Metode LYNKORT!
Omfattende litteraturstudie!
Form奪l: finde al eksisterende videnskabelig litteratur om et emne
Sammenfatte al eksisterende evidens i 竪n enkelt artikel
EVIDENSBASERET SYGEPLEJE
4. Fordelen ved systematiske reviews
Enormt tidsbesparende for l脱seren
B奪de positive og negative resultater fremstilles