Presentation to FPC by Stephanie KeltonDevinDSmith
?
The document discusses the views of Stephanie Kelton, an economist who rejects conventional economic theories about government spending and deficits. Some of her main conclusions are that money is not an object for governments; budget deficits are not inherently bad; and that government spending is needed to achieve full employment and potential economic output. She argues the government is the only entity that can increase spending when others are unable or unwilling to do so, in order to stimulate the overall economy. She rejects myths that the government cannot afford more spending or that it needs to operate like households in always balancing its budget.
Presentation to FPC by Stephanie KeltonDevinDSmith
?
The document discusses the views of Stephanie Kelton, an economist who rejects conventional economic theories about government spending and deficits. Some of her main conclusions are that money is not an object for governments; budget deficits are not inherently bad; and that government spending is needed to achieve full employment and potential economic output. She argues the government is the only entity that can increase spending when others are unable or unwilling to do so, in order to stimulate the overall economy. She rejects myths that the government cannot afford more spending or that it needs to operate like households in always balancing its budget.
MMT Basics: You Cannot Consider the Deficit in IsolationMitch Green
?
The document discusses how the government budget deficit cannot be viewed in isolation and must be considered in the context of the private sector balance. It shows that larger government deficits typically coincide with larger surpluses in the non-government sector, and that government deficits help support private sector surpluses. The Clinton surpluses occurred when the private sector balance turned sharply negative, demonstrating that focusing only on the government balance presents an incomplete picture.
It's What You Know for Sure that Just Ain't SoMitch Green
?
The document discusses Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) and its views on unemployment and job creation. MMT believes unemployment is socially and economically harmful and supports policies to achieve full employment. It argues that budget deficits by the government are necessary to offset private sector surpluses and allow the private sector to accumulate financial assets. MMT advocates for transition jobs or an employer of last resort program to absorb workers and reduce indirect social costs of unemployment."
This document discusses the importance of designing effective landing pages that create a positive first impression for users. It notes that first impressions are mostly design-related and can determine user satisfaction. The document recommends simplifying the layout with an attention-grabbing headline, highlighting key benefits, including social proof and graphics, and having a clear call-to-action. Designing for the visceral, behavioral and reflective emotional responses of users is also emphasized. The goal is to understand users and guide them through their experience in a way that tests assumptions and leads to the intended behavior.
This slide describes an internal community on software engineering at Hitachi corporate group. Originally revealed at XP祭り2019 - conference on eXtreme Programming in Japan.
15. Copyright (c) 2014 Guild Works Inc.
コミュニケーションコストを最小限に押さえ
かつ、より良いサービスを求める姿勢
=「自分事として捉えられる」こと
チームメンバーに求められること
スキル…
経験…
チームがサービス開発を自分事として
捉えられるようになるためには?
16. Copyright (c) 2014 Guild Works Inc.
本日のアジェンダ
仮説検証型のサービス開発で
求められるチームモデル
開発チームにおいてPassionateな
プロダクトオーナーが果たす役割
どのようにしてチームを
ビルディングしていくか
17. Copyright (c) 2014 Guild Works Inc.
Passionateな
プロダクトオーナーが果たす役割とは?
強いリーダー…
サーヴァントリーダー…
Whyでチームを導く
チームと共にWhyを育てる
18. Toshihiro Ichitani All Rights Reserved.
What
How
Why
アクション
Whyを実現
する手段
何のためにやる
ゴールデンサークル
Start With Why
19. Copyright (c) 2014 Guild Works Inc.
What
How
Why チームメンバー
???
Whyが見えない中でHowやWhatを
いくら考えても、実行してもムダ
20. Copyright (c) 2014 Guild Works Inc.
What
How
Why
プロダクトオーナー
チームメンバー
中心となってWhyを考える
Whyを実現するためのHow
をチームで考える
具体的なアクション(What)を
プロダクトオーナーとチームが
一体となって実行していく
Whyでチームを導く